This began as a symmetrical opening. Eventually, one side or the other will have to deviate from the imitation of the others’ moves. It is at that point when they game can finally be decided. But try to win some material while you’re at it!
I’d just like to mention, the endgame in this particularly match up is quite instructive. I really do love these rook vs. rook endings. You can do a lot by just improving your rook’s position from 4th rank, to 7th rank. There are a lot of nuances one has to really pay attention to when studying rook endings. Though this ending is not perfect, I felt fairly proud of being able to win this game, when I traded queens without having any material advantage.
The opening here is a #queenspawnopening . Not sure of the exact classification.
Black doesn’t really have much to work with, and I should have played a bit more aggressively in the opening, I feel. Patience turned out to work in my favor. I hoped my opponent would make a critical error in a semi-closed position. When I saw an opportunity to complicate things, tactically, I took advantage of that. It was strange that he chose to use so much time thinking about his next moves, though.
I imagine there are a number of guests here who are unfamiliar with the #Frenchdefense . A great system to use if you want to create some complications, and real chances for victory for black.
The French defense is rather stodgy. A semi closed opening, it never really opens up too much, as for example, in a double king pawn opening. It is more reminiscent of a turtle, hiding in it’s shell, waiting for you to get your hand too close…before you end up losing a finger! A snapping turtle!
I have added a game where I employ the black pieces in a #Frenchdefense , #advanced variation. (The name advanced is used because white advances his king pawn early to e5, thus creating a strong point from which to attack black’s king.)
Often, it is said, it is best to avoid doubling your pawns. Allowing pawns to be stacked, one atop the other, usually creates problems for your pawn’s mobility. 100% true! However, the pawns, when doubled, can defend certain key squares, provide open lanes for the rooks, and can even offer some support squares for a bishop…perhaps.
The point being…never become dogmatic in chess, as in life. When someone says “You can’t do this. Or you can’t do that.” You really have to ask “why?” If they don’t give you a reasonable, sound explanation to your liking, then I would suggest you keep an open mind to ideas about what you CAN and CANNOT do in life. Just about every rule in physics, for example, has to be re examined ever so often as new developments are occurring all the time. New developments which help to re write text books. So never abandon an idea…just because someone said it won’t work. Prove it for yourself. In this case, well, doubled pawns are sorta bad…but they offer some positives as well.
That concludes that short lesson. If you wish to learn more, just sign up for a lesson. THANKS!
Alas. A game which should’ve been won. However, I am playing on this website which shows advertisements all the time. The advertisements, with my poor connection, cause an awesome amount of lag in my games. I can barely even move the pieces when I am in a time scramble. Alas, the result was a drawn game when I have an extra queen and plenty of time to checkmate. Sorry, guys. I hope to have better luck next time around.
This game went pretty well for me. Black bringing the bishop out early to c5 has never really posed a huge problem for me. Particularly in slow games, when I can figure out how to blunt the pressure of the bishop along the g1-a7 diagonal.
My opponent’s handling of the opening seemed to leave something to be desired. I think black lacked forceful play. Allowing me to damage his pawn structure, with little compensation for it, was probably not the best thing to do. Also, black should have tried not to have allowed me to win a pawn so early in the game. This was what gave me plenty to play for in the middle game.
I am looking over this game, using my analysis engine. Of course, it's often difficult to find the best move in a blitz game of 3 minutes. However, my instinct told me that the endgame was winning for me.
Maybe one of my guests can point out the best choice for black in the endgame. My hunch says I should have pushed BOTH my king side pawns in order to play for a win. What say you?
In this game, i decided to play a Queen’s gambit declined, with the black pieces, against the typical English opening move order.
My opponent, likely a master or IM level player from Russia, seemed to get a little mixed up in the opening. Very strange decision to play the move h3?! on move 5.
You guys can have a look at this game. I really look forward to getting some input, some ideas from my guests.
My opponent plays his opening quite accurately. The #King’sIndianDefense . However, he goes wrong at some point when moving his queen around too many times. One cannot stray from the path of #development in chess. You must bring your forces out to the battlefield as quickly as possible. At all costs! It is the most important component of getting a good game against an opponent. Develop, Develop, Develop!
Always remember this when playing chess.